—
I am quite disappointed in Mr. Tunney’s implication conveyed in his comments (“Letters display sharp contrast in the mindset of America,” Aug. 28 Times-News) concerning my letter to the editor (“Sensitivity should work both ways, not just one way,” Aug. 22).
I do respect Mrs McDaniel-Weissler’s opinion (“This could be a gesture of peace and unity,” Aug. 23). The subject of my original letter was not Islam. I have a brother in law and four nieces who are Muslims. I have read the Holy Qur’an.
I can certainly distinguish between sensitivity and religious freedoms. Yes, there are stark differences in attitudes on the subject. However, I did not issue any disparagement or criticism of the religion in my comments.
The subjects of the commentary were clearly, Nancy Pelosi, sensitivity and the eagerness of the left to reframe or rename every issue that they support. They always seem to use excavation implements to throw their dirt rather than spades.
Investigate those who oppose the mosque, really, Nancy? This is an inflammatory rhetorical question out of the Alinsky play book. We all agree that the first amendment provides individuals with the right to practice their religion. That was clearly stated, Sir.
My brother-in-law believes that the mosque is provocative and does not promote understanding. Understanding should start with the party that affirmatively initiates the action.
Again, sensitivity is a two way street. Since 911 there have been tremendous opportunities for the condemnation of terrorism. There has been very little outcry from Feisal Abdul Rauf. Many rank and file Muslims have condemned these activities, while those in leadership have remained silent.
There are approximately 100 mosques in New York, today. This is a testament to tolerance.
Furthermore, the constitution allows for federal, state, county, municipal and community governments to enact zoning or put in place standards for building. The constitutionality of zoning ordinances was upheld in 1926.
The zoning ordinance of Euclid, Ohio, was challenged in court by a local land owner on the basis that restricting use of property violated the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.
Though initially ruled unconstitutional by lower courts, the zoning ordinance was upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court in Village of Euclid, Ohio v. Ambler Realty Co..Communities for example, have a right to prevent adult entertainment facilities near playgrounds as well as many other restrictions.
I resent the implication that those who oppose the building of the center are bigots and the misrepresentation of my words. What is objectionable here is comparable to someone screaming “peace” to the top of their lungs in your face.
Maybe both sides, including you, need to set down the tar bucket!
Arlen Sites Jr.
New Creek, W.Va.
Opinion
It’s wrong to imply that opposition amounts to bigotry
- Opinion
-
-
Isn’t the writter suggesting it really is a matter of choice?
The debate over homosexual marriage in the letters in this newspaper is very revealing. One writer claimed that, “denying these marriages is a form of minority discrimination.”
-
Adults can help keep children from suffering burn injuries
I am writing concerning your article in the Feb. 6 Times-News concerning National Burns Awareness Week “National Burn Awareness Week prompts safety tips,” Page 1B).
-
Story contained false information about snakes
I read the AP article written Feb 5. regarding the proposed exotic animal regulations in our great state (“W.Va. moves to tighten laws for wild animal owners,” Page 1B).
I must say I am disappointed to say the least at the irresponsible journalism that took place as to print downright lies. -
It would cost nothing to let these students ride the bus
Let me share with you how our Allegany County school system operates.
-
Not in the Bible, but the Communist Manifesto
President Obama has hit a new low. By promoting his reasoning for hiking taxes on the rich at the National Prayer Breakfast, he diminished the seriousness of his proposals and manipulated Jesus’ teachings for his own political purposes. How pathetic.
-
Landlords, tenants, city all responsible for smoke alarms Landlords, tenants, city all responsible for smoke alarms Landlords, tenants, city all responsible for smoke alarms
Are rental inspections being done?Is the landlord responsible for smoke detectors?
-
Get tough
Based on the number of drivers we see who are still talking on handheld cell phones, Maryland lawmakers are justified in making the state’s cell phone law tougher.
-
Argument for same-sex marriage is superficial
I am writing in response to a letter by Ian Stafford entitled, “Equal standards on marriage should be applied to everyone” (Feb. 3 Times-News).
The first thing I noticed about the article is the title. It appeared to be a Gov. O’Malley talking point repeated by his supporter to reframe the issue and promote his radical agenda. -
Some of city’s rail crossings in need of repair or replacement
As I was crossing the rail crossing today at Valley Street and Henderson Avenue, I felt like I was riding a horse-drawn buckboard.
It took several minutes for my kidneys and stomach to right themselves back into a normal position. -
WMHS Home Hospice seeks to increase outreach to veterans
The Western Maryland Health System Home Hospice Services is seeking to increase the outreach to local veterans as part of the “We Honor Veterans” campaign.
- More Opinion Headlines
-
Isn’t the writter suggesting it really is a matter of choice?
