—
I appreciate the replies to my letter concerning progressives (“Progressives have been heart, soul of America,” Aug. 25).
It’s good to dialogue, gain some clarity and have a civil conversation. We need more education and understanding on many subjects in this country in order to save something we love.
But I don’t think it helps to speak to the motives of progressives until you can look into their minds and intentions. As your words reflect your understanding of what a progressive is, I can see why you might find us troubling.
On the contrary, the progressive movement has always stood with the individual. When dealing with human and civil rights — from politics, to church, to workplace, to the corporate world — progressives have been there as the first to stand up and try to bring a better world.
Without brave and battered progressives, children would still be sewing in sweat shops, young boys would be digging in unsafe mines, women would still be the property of their husbands and no of property of their own, synagogues and Catholic churches would be barred from some neighborhoods, we’d still live in a segregated world, and parents would have to live with the heartache of shunning their own gay and lesbian children.
The Republican Party, and others, have been determined for years to roll back changes that the New Deal brought, benefitting the individual. Fear-mongering and distortion have been used before — always a part of the discussion.
Corporate interests and wealth have looked after their own groups. If Liberals have to vote to “push” something, when people are programmed not to understand the benefits, okay. And, if Republicans have to be the party of no — that’s fine, too. This is a Democracy — that’s politics.
Wars with borrowed money, tax breaks for those with more than they could spend in a lifetime, and unfunded senior’s drugs — conservative deficit spending.
No jobs, no tax revenue to help a reversal — while a vote on a funded bill to create jobs and help small businesses is blocked for political reasons.
Elitists, we are not. Progressives don’t promote the status quo. They don’t say, “I have mine, so who cares about those in need.” I see Progressives with open minds, hearts and hands. I see Conservatives as rigid thinking, stuck in the mud.
Thank God, in this country we are free to have and express our own views. Check your sources.
Cynthia S. Knight
Grantsville
Opinion
Which do you prefer, open minds or stuck in the mud?
- Opinion
-
-
Isn’t the writter suggesting it really is a matter of choice?
The debate over homosexual marriage in the letters in this newspaper is very revealing. One writer claimed that, “denying these marriages is a form of minority discrimination.”
-
Adults can help keep children from suffering burn injuries
I am writing concerning your article in the Feb. 6 Times-News concerning National Burns Awareness Week “National Burn Awareness Week prompts safety tips,” Page 1B).
-
Story contained false information about snakes
I read the AP article written Feb 5. regarding the proposed exotic animal regulations in our great state (“W.Va. moves to tighten laws for wild animal owners,” Page 1B).
I must say I am disappointed to say the least at the irresponsible journalism that took place as to print downright lies. -
It would cost nothing to let these students ride the bus
Let me share with you how our Allegany County school system operates.
-
Not in the Bible, but the Communist Manifesto
President Obama has hit a new low. By promoting his reasoning for hiking taxes on the rich at the National Prayer Breakfast, he diminished the seriousness of his proposals and manipulated Jesus’ teachings for his own political purposes. How pathetic.
-
Landlords, tenants, city all responsible for smoke alarms Landlords, tenants, city all responsible for smoke alarms Landlords, tenants, city all responsible for smoke alarms
Are rental inspections being done?Is the landlord responsible for smoke detectors?
-
Get tough
Based on the number of drivers we see who are still talking on handheld cell phones, Maryland lawmakers are justified in making the state’s cell phone law tougher.
-
Argument for same-sex marriage is superficial
I am writing in response to a letter by Ian Stafford entitled, “Equal standards on marriage should be applied to everyone” (Feb. 3 Times-News).
The first thing I noticed about the article is the title. It appeared to be a Gov. O’Malley talking point repeated by his supporter to reframe the issue and promote his radical agenda. -
Some of city’s rail crossings in need of repair or replacement
As I was crossing the rail crossing today at Valley Street and Henderson Avenue, I felt like I was riding a horse-drawn buckboard.
It took several minutes for my kidneys and stomach to right themselves back into a normal position. -
WMHS Home Hospice seeks to increase outreach to veterans
The Western Maryland Health System Home Hospice Services is seeking to increase the outreach to local veterans as part of the “We Honor Veterans” campaign.
- More Opinion Headlines
-
Isn’t the writter suggesting it really is a matter of choice?





